»
« home   paste   Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account 05-21-2019 11:43 CEST
 
* X »
«
GeSHi - Generic Syntax Highlighter Syntax Coloriser for PHP
  

Viewing Issue Simple Details Jump to Notes ] View Advanced ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID Category Severity Reproducibility Date Submitted Last Update
0000097 [GeSHi] lang tweak sometimes 01-26-07 01:43 02-02-07 03:32
Reporter BenBE View Status public  
Assigned To Knut
Priority low Resolution open  
Status assigned   Product Version 1.1.2alpha3
Summary 0000097: Lots of Keywords missing for C#
Description There are many identifiers missing (i.e. mainly function names) that are part of .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 which could be introduced to be highlighted within the C# language file.
Additional Information
Attached Files

- Relationships
child of 0000102assigned Knut C# support 

- Notes
(0000474)
Knut
01-31-07 09:39

Yeah, I'm working on it ;)

Which keywords are you, in that case, talking about? Can you provide a more-or-less list?

Regards, Knut
 
(0000479)
BenBE
02-01-07 07:55

Mainly I marked this regarding the stdprocs and stdtypes lists you might have noticed in c and delphi. I already asked someone who as bit more experience in C# to create me such a list for "common" \ "basic" functions of C#. But this might take a bit until I get reply.

Regarding the type list I'm not quite sure if you should add the basic object class (compare TObject for Delphi) to the list of types highlighted?

Regarding the keywords itself you might need to distinguish between managed and unmanaged code (for some features like ASM???) As mentioned ... I'm not that good at C# - It's mostly what I'd expect it to highlight to make meaningful adaption of the BorIDE theme for it (basic stuff prepared).

As mentioned: detailed list of functions you could\should highlight will follow ASAP.
 
(0000481)
Knut
02-01-07 09:26

Ok.

I'll just do it like this:

I fill in whatever I can remember/dig up. Then we all bombard GeSHi with C# source, and write here whatever does not get highlighted that we think should be. And I'll fix it.
 

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
01-26-07 01:43 BenBE New Issue
01-31-07 09:39 Knut Note Added: 0000474
01-31-07 09:39 Knut Assigned To  => Knut
01-31-07 09:39 Knut Status new => feedback
02-01-07 07:55 BenBE Note Added: 0000479
02-01-07 07:59 BenBE Relationship added child of 0000102
02-01-07 09:26 Knut Note Added: 0000481
02-01-07 09:26 Knut Status feedback => confirmed
02-01-07 09:26 Knut Status confirmed => assigned
02-01-07 11:01 BenBE Note Added: 0000486
02-02-07 03:32 BenBE Note Added: 0000487
02-02-07 04:07 BenBE Note Edited: 0000487

  


Mantis 1.0.0rc2[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2005 Mantis Group
41 total queries executed.
30 unique queries executed.
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker